home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Hackers Underworld 2: Forbidden Knowledge
/
Hackers Underworld 2: Forbidden Knowledge.iso
/
UFO
/
JSLEAR.REP
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1989-12-31
|
13KB
|
215 lines
EXTRATERRESTRIAL BIOLOGICAL ENTITIES (EBE'S) AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO
HUMAN BEINGS ON EARTH: AN EXPLANATORY HYPOTHESIS
PART I
Preface
The following hypothesis discusses the significance of UFO occupant
activities to human civilization and development. To understand the
terminology and concepts discussed in this paper, readers are encouraged
to review the following works: UFO Crash at Aztec by William Steinman and
Wendelle Stevens, particularly the addendum in the back of the book titled
"The Bennewitz Story" (pages 578-604); The Roswell Incident by William
Moore; Leonard Stringfield's Status Reports II and III on UFO
crash/retrievals; John Lear's "LEAR.TXT" on Paranet computer bulletin
board; the updated transcript of Linda Howe's documentary "Strange
Harvest" (page 64); Jerome Clark's article in the April 1988 issue of Fate
magazine: "UFO Crashes, Part IV", and Communion by Whitley Strieber.
Introduction
In December of 1987, airline pilot and UFO researcher John Lear published
a letter on Paranet. Based on his research, Lear concluded that
extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE's) are malevolent beings from
space who have orchestrated a deceptive, "well-planned invasion of Earth
for its resources and benefits." Lear's scenario reads like the plot of a
science fiction horror film: The EBE'S have perpetrated a "grand
deception" on humans to hide their true motives which are to create
human-alien crossbreeds, presumably for sinister purposes, and consume
human
biological matter. According to Lear, the EBE'S terminate any humans who
might interfere with them.
Because John Lear appears to be sincere in his research and has
impressive credentials, ufologists are seriously examining his statement.
For example, Jim Speiser, Paranet's administrator, says in his
introduction to Lear's letter, "John...has contacts in sensitive positions
that could conceivably allow him access to information of this type."
Lear may have contacts that have provided him with accurate data, but
his speculations and hypotheses are presented with the same authority and
confidence as his alleged facts, even though his conclusions seem
extremely questionable.
Rather than being sinister or malevolent, is it possible that EBE'S
are members of an advanced evolutionary level of life who are tending this
planet as a garden? Might they be cultivating human life, not as a food
source, but to give human beings the opportunity to become, through their
choices, potential members and contributors to the EBE's' advanced level?
Could this planet be one of numerous planetary "gardens" established by
the EBE's for such a purpose?
In this context, all EBE activity could be seen as benevolent.
However, certain aspects of their work might seem frightening or
traumatic to a human mind, depending on that mind's level of development
and comprehension. Does the plant understand when the gardener uproots it
to replant it in better soil, or prunes and grafts to ensure proper
improved growth?
In the field of science, a single set of data has often been
interpreted in profoundly different ways. When we are dealing with
obviously advanced technology, how can we be sure that we are interpreting
what we see with any accuracy? Can those who base conclusions about
advanced beings only on what is measurable or verifiable by current
technology ever see more than a limited picture? Even if John Lear's
facts are correct concerning underground CIA-alien facilities, body parts
floating in vats of amber liquid, etc., the facts do not necessarily
warrant Lear's horrified conclusions.
Is it possible to arrive at a valid conclusion based solely on "hard
evidence"? Perhaps not, but we should not adopt a purely spiritual
approach either, as do many UFO contactees and "channelers" or we risk
arriving at pleasant metaphysical fantasies that do not jive with observed
phenomena.
Lear posed the question, "What is the big picture, anyway?"
(Lear.txt). In attempting to answer this, we obviously need a big frame
of reference. Perhaps examining some of the details that Lear discussed
will give us that perspective.
* * * * *
John Lear suggests, along with Budd Hopkins, that EBE's may be on the
"backside of an evolutionary genetic curve." They base this on the EBE's
having, for example, a lack of hair and teeth, fewer fingers and toes, and
atrophied or missing digestive and reproductive organs. Isn't it possible
that just the opposite is true--that the absence of digestive and
reproductive organs are signs of evolving and outgrowing the need for
"primitive" organs? Rather than the EBE's needing to revitalize
themselves by inbreeding with humans and/or consuming extractions from
human and bovine tissue, isn't it possible that they are experimenting
with hybridization and tissue samples for our sakes?
If you consider the possibility that UFO occupants may have been
involved in the creation of free-willed human beings from the very
beginning, couldn't their present genetic work be an effort to correct the
severe damage that we have inflicted upon our genetic structure? Maybe
the EBE's are seeking ways to undo the effects of generations of
unrestrained primitive behavior (territorialism, wars,selfishness, etc.),
drug usage, pollution, food additives, etc.?
Could EBE's represent the goal toward which human beings have the
capacity to evolve if they choose? This may be difficult for some to
accept if they see the EBE's appearance as "strange" by human standards.
Could it also be hard to think about because our egos have difficulty with
the notion that human beings do not represent the height of evolutionary
advancement in the universe? Lear himself notes how difficult it was for
the human mind to accept that the Sun does not revolve around the Earth.
Lear acknowledges that EBE's may be as much as a billion years ahead
of human beings in advancement. How does this jive with his statement
that "the EBE's have a genetic disorder in that their digestive system is
atrophied?" It seems more probable that a digestive system is simply not
required for a space-dwelling organism. (Just think of the time that
leaves them free to do more significant work than preparing food, eating,
digesting, and eliminating.) And if they are so advanced that they can
create life in a laboratory, why would they need reproductive organs?
Lear concludes that EBE's are deriving sustenance from enzyme or
hormonal secretions applied to their skin. Aren't there other possible
explanations for these applications? This is pure conjecture, but could
they be applying these secretions to their skin as a means of analyzing
them, that
is, using their own bodies as test subjects?
Let's take a look at so-called mutilations for a moment. A
significant point in researcher Linda Howe's examination of animal
mutilations comes in an update to her documentary "Strange Harvest." In
the transcript of that film (update 1st broadcast, May 25, 1980), Howe
says she received information from a psychic in Albuquerque. The psychic
correctly predicted that a deviation would occur in the surgical method
used by the aliens, "...which is...a necessity in order to arrive at a
success in formulation of a serum-like concoction which will be returned
to mankind during a time of need." (Howe p. 64) Linda Howe might be
commended for her courage as an investigator in quoting a psychic. The
point is that there may be beneficial reasons why the EBE's are performing
their surgical operations. It is interesting that when a tribe of American
Indians were once asked what they thought of "mutilations" occurring on
their reservation, they replied simply, "The star people know what they
are doing, and should be trusted."
Before continuing to speculate about the motivations of UFO occupants,
we have to ask ourselves, is it possible to understand what EBE's are and
what they are doing if we don't know what human beings are?
Consider, if you will, that the true nature of man is a "life for